SEBI proposes MF-only PMS with ₹25 lakh entry: Expert explains how it differs from traditional PMS

MF-only PMS vs traditional PMS: Expert decodes SEBI's new proposal (AI-Generated Image)AI Quick ReadFor years, investors with ₹25 lakh of investable surplus occupied a gap in India’s wealth management ecosystem. They often had enough capital to seek professional investment assistance but did not qualify for Portfolio Management Services (PMS), where the minimum investment requirement is ₹50 lakh.

SEBI’s proposed Mutual Fund-only Portfolio Management Service (MF-PMS) framework, outlined in its consultation paper released on 23 July, could expand access to professionally managed portfolios by lowering the minimum investment requirement to ₹25 lakh.

This framework is meant for portfolio managers who exclusively manage client investments only in direct plans of mutual fund schemes, including exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and Specialized Investment Funds (SIFs).

According to Sandeep Jethwani, Co-founder, Dezerv, this could benefit investors who have built significant investable surpluses but do not meet the eligibility criteria for traditional PMS.

He estimates that this segment could include around 1.5 crore to 2 crore Indian citizens with investable surpluses ranging from ₹25 lakh to ₹50 lakh.

Mutual funds were introduced to simplify investing by reducing the complexity of selecting individual stocks. However, the rapid expansion of the mutual fund industry has created new challenges for investors.

“Mutual funds were originally conceived to simplify the complexity of individual stock selection, yet today’s landscape features roughly 2,000 schemes against a backdrop of just 500 investable stocks,” Jethwani mentioned.

The increasing number of schemes has made fund selection, portfolio construction, asset allocation and regular monitoring more challenging for investors.

The proposed MF-only PMS framework seeks to provide a regulated structure where investors can delegate these responsibilities to professional managers instead of managing multiple mutual fund investments themselves.

Traditional PMS allows managers to invest across a wider universe, including listed equities, listed debt securities, mutual fund units, and ETFs. SEBI’s consultation paper has also proposed expanding the investment universe for traditional PMS to include unlisted securities and foreign securities.

“The MF-only PMS restricts the universe to direct plans of mutual funds, ETFs, and Specialized Investment Funds. Nothing else,” Jethwani said.

Another important difference is the level of responsibility for investment decisions.

In an advisory model, professionals provide recommendations, but investors remain responsible for executing those suggestions, monitoring portfolios and making decisions during market volatility.

According to Jethwani, investment strategies often fail because investors delay execution, miss rebalancing opportunities or take emotional decisions during market fluctuations.

“Conversely, an MF-only PMS operates under a discretionary mandate. Here, the manager holds the legal authority to act and is directly accountable for the portfolio’s performance,” he explained.